inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable
inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable [inalienable, imprescriptible and unseizable]

inalienable, imprescriptible and unseizable”¹ is the title of the first solo exhibition for conceptual artist Daniel de Paula on Mexican soil.

The exhibition derives from the need to formulate a critical reflection of coercive processes linked to the territorialization of capital in which state territorial planning and the implementation of energy generating infrastructures are intimately linked to exploitative practices and the abstract logics of property and value production.

More specifically, Daniel de Paula (Boston, 1987) conducted field research on generating systems of wind energy located in the surroundings of the city of Montezuma², from the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, where colossal wind turbine farms stretch across the landscape in stark material contrast to the pre-existing vernacular culture.

Disguised as technical and progressive discourses that praise renewable forms of energy, such systems transform the landscape into a capitalistic force of production, obscuring the violent operations that convert communal land into a financial asset to be monopolized, commodified, and speculated upon, consolidating public and private interests and efforts in the search for profits.³

The field study carried out by the artist establishes a clear parallelism between the processes of implementing wind farms in Montezuma, Brazil with other global contexts, such as the southern Isthmus of Tehuantepec (Oaxaca) in Mexico. Despite the geographical distinctions between Mexico and Brazil, these generators similarly occupy immense territorial expansions that have serious environmental and social impacts on the local populations of mostly indigenous communities.⁴

In both cases, energy-generating wind turbines are the visible vectors of the driving forces of modernization, as sustainable development suggests a positive interpretation of energy production and, consequently, of physical and metaphysical light.⁵

However, the brilliant light of sustainable economic growth essentially constitutes the imposition of a capitalist sociability, light as colonization, light as justification for exploitation, light as aggression, and light as a productive basis of power relations. Behind the light, in the shadows cast by the wind turbines, there is a glimpse of the infrastructure companies’ imposing advancement that devastates places and people using tax exemptions and incentives to sell the ideals of progress.

In his exhibition at Labor, Daniel de Paula, by combining a variety of objects and precise gestures, continues his critical investigations of the economic and political forces that produce space and reproduce violent social relations.
In this context, from a more conceptual perspective that evidences the relationship of the gallery’s physical space with the systems of energy generation and its distribution, Daniel proposed, as part of the exhibition planning, that a Mexican collector agree to pay for the electricity of Labor’s exhibition space by selling the naming rights of the gallery’s electric bill and the light itself.

Following a logic of inquiry in the gallery space, the artist intervened the walls by mixing the paint with appropriated dust from the roads on which trucks transported the blades of wind turbines. Thus, the exhibition space emulates the real-life activities in the towns near Montezuma, where this dust settles on the vegetation in agricultural plantations preventing photosynthesis and the generation of food.

Distributed on the floor and walls of the gallery, you can see sculptures of distinctively material qualities in which the artist juxtaposes the rocks resulting from geotechnical drilling processes implemented to measure wind turbine constructions, with scaffolding clamps and brass pipes also used for the construction of power generating systems. These works are part of a sculptural series in progress since 2016, entitled inseparable spatial structure. Intermingled among them, we see another series of sculptures composed by the pairing of infrastructural cables (electrical and mechanical) with fulgurites (fossilized rays). The latter corresponds to the power-flow series, also in progress since 2020.

Aware of the inevitably fetishistic nature of the process for marketing his works, Daniel de Paula proposes the sale of his own shadow –through a legal contract and a certificate of authenticity– in a gesture of self-dispossession that confronts the impetuously ideological essence of capitalism, where abstract concepts of property, value, capital, and labor advance above all else as a solid penumbra.

In addition to this work, and using the same contractual procedure, Daniel proposes the commercialization of shadows belonging to three mountains related to the history and formation of neoliberal ideas in the world, confronting the materiality of geology with the intangibility of capital.

Finally, in a video presented from the artist’s own cell phone, Daniel compiled ghostly images resulting from his field research in the surrounding Montezuma area.

The exhibition inalienable, imprescriptible and unseizable is not only interested in the residue that emerges from the objects of the artist’s study –in this case, the wind farms in Montezuma–but also, in the professional context of art. Despite the positive feeling of autonomy linked to the artistic field –separated in appearance from the world crisis– the art market reproduces, in its essence, the shadows of capital and its dominant social relations.

© Daniel de Paula

© Daniel de Paula

the Shadow is a substance, any substance can be commodified, all commodification is theft.⁶

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “the shadow of value”. Vista de instalación en Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “the shadow of value”. Installation view at Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “inalienable, imprescriptible e inembargable”. Labor, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “conquest-chasm”, 2023.

Daniel de Paula, “conquest-chasm”, 2023.

NOTES

[1] The title of the exhibition refers to Article 74 of the Mexican Agrarian Law which determines that "the ownership of common use lands is inalienable, imprescriptible and unseizable, except in the cases provided for in Article 75 of this law", which, in turn, specifies that "in cases of manifest utility for the ejidal population nucleus, the latter may transfer the ownership of common use lands to mercantile or civil societies...", thus leaving open the possibility of incorporating common use lands into the private land market.

[2] Montezuma is a Brazilian municipality with 8,315 inhabitants and located in the region with the lowest human development index in the state of Minas Gerais. The municipality's name is a tribute to Francisco Gomes Brandão, lawyer, diplomat and politician who adopted the name Francisco Gê Acaiba de Montezuma in the context of the Brazilian independence, incorporating in his name indigenous elements of Brazil and a reference to Montezuma Xocoyotzin, emperor of the Tenochca Empire. One of the largest wind farms in Brazil is located between the cities of Montezuma, MG, and Caetité, BA.

[3] "The wind farms that occupy immense territorial extensions cause great socio-environmental impacts for the local populations, mostly traditional communities. In addition to the return of land grabbing, the leases signed are secretive, abusive and totally favorable to the companies, the vast majority of which do not even explain the content of these contracts and the peasants are pressured to sign between the house and the farm gate, compromising all future generation [...]. Not to mention that wind farms, largely financed by public investment and handed over to private hands, reinforce a model of progress, increasing concentration and generating profits for a few." (Kluck, Erick, 2019) Planejamento estatal de perspectiva territorial no campo baiano

[4] "Throughout the process of wind energy development in the Isthmus, pressure from government authorities was intense, sometimes resorting to excessive use of force to repress blockades by groups opposed to the construction of wind farms. Between 2011-2013, for example, when the conflict against the "Mareña Renovables" wind farm project was at its peak, the governor of the State of Oaxaca, Gabino Cué, reinforced the police presence and, while sending a negotiating mission to end the blockades, threatened to use full force, even if blood was spilled. It does not seem that the government pressure was exclusively to guarantee social peace, as different political figures and public officials at the national, state and local levels had direct and particular interests in the project." (González; Suárez, 2017) VIENTOS DEL CAPITALISMO VERDE: glocalization, development and transition

[5] "Wind power companies have deployed discursive and marketing strategies to build a corporate image committed to sustainable business and development models through environmental and social responsibility. All this is reflected in their web pages or in the Environmental and Social Impact Manifests that accompany the projects, which become arguments for the companies' philanthropy. Some wind farms and projects have even taken names in indigenous languages to create an image of a friendly company, as in the case of Stipa Nayaá ("clean energy"), Bi Nee Stipa ("wind that brings energy"), Bi Stinú ("our wind" or "Isthmian wind"), Bi Hioxo ("strong wind"), Xtipa Bi ("strength" or "wind energy"), Bi Binnizá ("wind of the Binnizá"). " (González; Suárez, 2017) WINDS OF GREEN CAPITALISM: glocalization, development and transition


[6] Constituent clause of the contract of purchase and sale of the shadows commercialized in the exhibition, where the buyer of the shadow recognizes and accepts the following terms established by the artist: "the Shadow is a substance, any substance can be commodified, any commodification is a theft".